top
US
US
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Just in case anyone was wondering where the Democrats stand

by Infuriated
Wondering where the Democrats stand on Abortion?
They aren't standing at all. They're just running. I'm disgusted.
Oh, and by the way..the anti-choice march? That's taking place in San Francisco on January 22nd? That's starting in Justin Herman Plaza at 11 am? PPGG organizers estimate that between 7,000 to 10,000 anti-choice activist are expected. (Their parade permit allows for 10,000)
Where will you be?


Anxiety Over Abortion
Pro-choice Democrats eye a more restrictive approach to abortion as one way to gain ground at the polls
By Debra Rosenberg
Newsweek
Dec. 20 issue - The week after Thanksgiving, dozens of Democratic Party loyalists gathered at AFL-CIO headquarters for a closed-door confab on the election. John Kerry dropped by to thank members of the liberal 527 coalition America Votes. When Ellen Malcolm, president of the pro-choice political network EMILY's List, asked about the future direction of the party, Kerry tackled one of the Democrats' core tenets: abortion rights. He told the group they needed new ways to make people understand they didn't like abortion. Democrats also needed to welcome more pro-life candidates into the party, he said. "There was a gasp in the room," says Nancy Keenan, the new president of NARAL Pro-Choice America.
It might have sounded shocking, but John Kerry isn't alone in taking a new look at how the party is handling the explosive topic of abortion. As Democratic strategists and lawmakers quietly discuss how to straddle the nation's Red-Blue divide, abortion has become a prime target. "The issue and the message need to be completely rethought," says one strategist. Along with gay marriage, abortion is at the epicenter of the culture wars, another example used by Republicans to highlight the Democrats' supposed moral relativism. Polls show that most Americans support legal abortion, yet they also favor some restrictions, particularly after the first trimester. Strategists say that's where many Democrats are, too—the public just doesn't know it. With pro-life Sen. Harry Reid newly installed as Senate minority leader, Democrats are eager to show off their big tent.
No one's suggesting that the party abandon its pro-choice roots. With George W. Bush expected to nominate as many as three presumably pro-life Supreme Court justices this term, advocates worry that the right to an abortion is more imperiled than it's been in decades. But as a step toward ultimately preserving that basic right, some Democrats now favor embracing common-sense restrictions on it. One possible initiative: a bill banning third-trimester abortions with broad exceptions for the life and health of the mother.
Democratic lawmakers have found themselves boxed in by a pro-choice orthodoxy that fears the slippery slope—the idea that allowing even the smallest limitation on abortion only paves the way for outlawing it altogether. As a result, most Democrats opposed popular measures like "Laci and Conner's Law"—which makes it a separate federal crime to kill a fetus—and a ban on the gruesome procedure called partial-birth abortion.
A small group of pro-choice Democrats—mostly from Red States—bucked that trend, voting for one or both measures. Still, the issue is so thorny that nearly every lawmaker contacted by NEWSWEEK declined to discuss those votes or the topic in general. But a handful of those senators—including Louisiana Sen. Mary Landrieu, Arkansas Sens. Blanche Lincoln and Mark Pryor, and Indiana Sen. Evan Bayh—have joined a new progressive advocacy group, Third Way, that hopes to move the party to the center on a number of cultural issues, including abortion. The effort is headed by a team of strategists who helped the Dems find middle ground on gun safety.
It's clear that challenging the old orthodoxy won't be easy. Many advocates blame Kerry for not talking about abortion enough—especially the fate of the Supreme Court. "He did not help the cause," says Planned Parenthood president Gloria Feldt. Other pro-choicers worry that changing gears on abortion will look like flip-flopping. "If we try to be fake Republicans, that's not going to work," says Colorado Rep. Diana DeGette, co-chair of the House pro-choice caucus. "It would be a cynical political move." But some moderate pro-choicers already have voting records to back up their convictions. That's proof, strategists say, that they don't have to choose between values and votes.
© 2004 Newsweek, Inc.



by a voter
Democrats -- That's one way to show MORAL VALUES. Just give up on everything your Party ever stood for.

Also need to endorse torture, privatize Social Security, ignore global warming, throw out the First Amendment, etc.
by just wondering
How many police will be there to protect them?
"we're finally on our own . . . . "

Crosby, Stills, Nash and Young

"Ohio" (1970)
by Socialist
We who support our right to abortion will celebrate 32 years of Roe v. Wade guaranteeing our right to a safe and legal abortion on Saturday, January 22, 2005, with a rally at Justin Herman Plaza.

We will not allow the Democrat-Republican Party to bring this Trojan Horse of anti-abortion for fascism into San Francisco. We will protest this outrage, celebrate Roe v. Wade and run the Democrat-Republicans out of San Francisco for good.

If you are still sitting in the Democratic Party and are for our right to abortion, leave now. It is rotten to the core. Join the socialist Peace & Freedom Party or the Green Party, both of which always support our right to abortion and do not support fascist marches anywhere.
by just wondering
You've actually seen this permit? To what organization was it issued? What's the issue date? What's its number? Who signed it?
by so lazy?
If you really, really want to know if this is real, don't assume the original poster is sitting around here waiting to answer your questions, go to the source:

PPGG Communications Department at press [at] ppgg.org or (415) 441-7858 and press 2 for media
by Quote of the Day
http://www.sptimes.com/2004/12/08/Business/Wanted__Ad_agency_to_.shtml

(snip)

Psy-ops - which also can involve the deliberate use of false information - has been a tool of the military since Alexander the Great used oversized shields to make the enemy believe he had an army of giants.

(snip)

by gehrig
nessie: "Excuse me, but that is unmitigated bullshit. I asked legitimate questions and did you a tremendous favor by spotting what appears to be disinfo by Smashy. And this is the thanks I get? Gimme a break. "

The irony is so thick you could build an Eiffel Tower with it.

@%<
by about nothing
the story is true

sometimes they're not actually out to get you, and you're just paranoid and wasting your own and everyon else's time

end of story
by heard it before
Maybe it is and maybe it isn't. We have no to tell without proof. That part of the story is missing. Where is it? Where is the proof? The proof is the single most important part of the story. Why is it not being reported? Has it not been researched yet? Why not? We, the readers, deserve better journalism than this. Let's see some. Do the research, post the proof, and stop taking us for such fools as to accept without question an unsubstantiated allegation, especially when posted on a site where we can't even trust people to not sign other people's names to blatant forgeries.

by gehrig
nessie-obsessie: "yammity yammity ? yammity yammity ? yammity ? ? ? yammity ? yammity ? ? ? ? yammity ? yammity yammity?"

You know, nessie, if you go to SF-IMC (and I wish you would), you'd see that seven out of eight posts there are as substantiated as the one you're going squawky-squawky about here.

How's the motes and beams shop going, eh?

@%<
by there he goes again
Note how Gehrig changes the subject, yet again, rather than addressing the issue. And surprise, surprise, he’s doing it with yet another ad hominem. Is bunk logic all he knows? Apparently that's all they teach in Zionist propaganda school these days. Oh well. It's too bad in a way. It would be nice to hear him address some other topic than Zionism and its opponents. It is extremely hard to believe that he would even post here in this, a thread not about Zionism, were a known anti-Zionist not here to attack. But hey, that’s apparently his job. He certainly works it like a job. I wonder how much he’s being paid to disrupt and discredit Indymedia with his vile and disgusting racism. Anyone care to guess?


by heard it before
More bunk logic from the master of the style.

Nevertheless, even if I ate babies, f*cked sheep and worshiped the devil, it would in no way disprove what I say. The fact remains, Gehrig and his fellow racists are a cancer within Indymedia. If it is not excised, it will metastasize, and eventually kill its host. Like any news organization, Indymedia lives or dies by its credibility. How credible is any organization that purports to support Global Justice, but harbors racists in its midst and publishes racist propaganda?

by anti-racist
More bunk logic from the master of the style.

Nevertheless, even if gehrig were the devil incarnate nessie makes of him, it would in no way disprove what gehrig says. The fact remains, nessie and his fellow racists are a cancer within Indymedia. If it is not excised, it will metastasize, and eventually kill its host. Like any news organization, Indymedia lives or dies by its credibility. How credible is any organization that purports to support Global Justice, but harbors racists like nessie in its midst and publishes racist propaganda?
by he has it wrong again
What I am defending is Indymedia's reputation for support of Global Justice, which in incompatible with the harboring of racists and the publishing of racist propaganda. Indymedia cannot be taken seriously as a credible news source, let alone as an activist organization, until the Zionists are as banned as their spiritual brethren the Nazis.
by heard it before
What nessie is assailing is Indymedia's reputation for support of Global Justice, which is incompatible with the harboring of anti-Zionist racists and the publishing of their racist propaganda. Indymedia cannot be taken seriously as a credible news source, let alone as an activist organization, until the nessiesque anti-Zionists are as banned as their spiritual brethren and mentors, the Nazis.

by gehrig
nessie: "yammity yammity justice yammity yammity racist yammity yammity"

translation: "Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain."

@%<
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$210.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network